In this experiment we will study the following:
In order for gammas to be detected, they must lose energy in the detector. Since gammas are electromagnetic radiation, we must understand how such radiation interacts with matter. There are three distinct modes of interaction: photoelectric effect, Compton scattering, and pair-production.
The photoelectric effect is when a gamma (i.e, a photon) is absorbed by an atom and an electron is released. The electron, initially in a bound state, uses some of the energy of the photon to escape the orbit of the atom (this is the binding energy, or the work function for that atom) and the rest of the energy goes into excess kinetic energy.
Compton scattering is when a gamma elastically scatters from a free electron. The process produces a photon of reduced energy and an electron with kinetic energy. Note that Rayleigh scattering, or elastic scattering, may be considered a special case of Compton scattering with the electron replaced by a more massive object, e.g., a nucleus. A schematic of Compton scattering is shown in Fig. 1.
{
${/download/attachments/164078984/fig_1.png?version=1&modificationDate=1499973046000&api=v2}$
Figure 1: A gamma of initial energy E scatters from an electron at angle _θ _(relative to the incident direction), carrying away energy E'
The relation between the incoming and outgoing gamma energies is given by the Compton scattering formula,
E′=E1+Emc2(1−cosθ)E′=E1+Emc2(1−cosθ) { $E' = \dfrac{E}{1+\frac{E}{mc^2}\left(1-\cos\theta\right)}$ , | (1) |
where mc2=0.511MeVmc2=0.511MeV {
$mc^2 = 0.511 \;\mathrm{MeV}$ is the rest-energy of the electron, EE {
$E$ is the energy of the incident gamma, E′E′ {
$E'$ is the energy of the scattered gamma, and θθ {
$\theta$ is the angle of scatter (measured relative to the incident direction.)
Finally, when a gamma passes near a massive nucleus, pair production can occur whereby the energy of the gamma is converted to mass (an electron-positron pair) with kinetic energy. For this process to occur, the gamma must have at least twice the rest-energy of the electron, or 2 x 0.511 MeV.
When a gamma passes through a material, there is a probability for interaction. One way to quantify this probability for interaction is through a quantity called the linear attenuation coefficient, λλ {
$\lambda$ . Mathematically, if N0N0 {
$N_0$ gammas are incident on a material, then it is expected that only N=N0e−λxN=N0e−λx {
$N = N_0 e^{-\lambda x}$ gammas will remain (i.e. will not interact) after passing through a thickness xx {
$x$ .
The total linear attenuation coefficient (and the contribution from each of the above interactions) in sodium iodide (NaI) as a function of gamma energy is shown in Fig. 2.
{
${/download/attachments/164078984/fig_2.png?version=1&modificationDate=1499973046000&api=v2}$\\
Figure 2: Linear attenuation coefficients for gammas in sodium iodide (NaI).
It is important to note that in each of the modes of interaction, the gamma’s energy is converted to an electron having kinetic energy. The electron – and charged particles in general – traveling through matter lose energy in a manner different from gammas.
A vast majority of the volume of bulk matter contains electrons. Those electrons feel a Coulomb force as another electron moves through the bulk matter. The cumulative forces acting on the moving electron bring it to rest in a short distance.
Question 1: If a 1 MeV gamma enters a NaI crystal, what is the most likely mode of interaction? (Hint: see Fig. 2.)
If the gamma undergoes a “head-on” collision with an electron in the crystal, the gamma will be scattered by 180°. Applying Eq. (1), show that this electron will have kinetic energy of about 0.8 MeV.
Question 2: Is this sufficient energy to kick the electron loose from the bound state in the crystal? Hint: Compare this energy to the ionization potential of hydrogen.
Question 3: Is this electron relativistic? Hint: Use the Lorentz factor,
γ=11−v2/c2=1+kineticenergyrestenergyγ=11−v2/c2−−−−−−−−√=1+kineticenergyrestenergy { $\gamma = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{1-{v^2}/{c^2}}} = 1 + \dfrac{\mathrm{kinetic\; energy}}{\mathrm{rest\; energy}}$ . | (2) |
Such an electron will move only about 1 mm in NaI before losing all of its kinetic energy. Approximate experimental values of the range of electrons in NaI as a function of electron energy are shown in Fig. 3.
{
${/download/attachments/164078984/Electron%20Energy%20Range.png?version=1&modificationDate=1570039070000&api=v2}$\\
Figure 3: Average range of electrons in sodium iodide as a function of electron energy.
In this experiment, the gammas are detected by a sodium iodide crystal doped with a small amount of thallium, NaI(Tl). The gammas entering the NaI crystal may undergo the photoelectric effect, but more probably will Compton scatter from the electrons in the crystal. (See Fig. 2 for a sense of the “probability of interaction”, which is proportional to the linear attenuation coefficient.)
There are two products of this scattering: a scattered electron and a gamma of reduced energy. The electron loses energy very quickly in the crystal. The rate of energy loss, -d_E_/d_x_, is governed by the Bethe formula (see e.g. Radiation Detection and Measurement by G. Knoll for details). In the process of moving through the crystal, the scattered electron excites electrons in the crystal's valence band into the conduction band, leaving a trail of electron-hole pairs. Holes migrate to the thallium impurity sites and ionize them. The ionized thallium atoms capture electrons, ultimately return to the ground state, and give off visible light. Meanwhile, the remaining gamma moves through the crystal losing energy only when it scatters from another electron.
With each successive scattering, the remaining gamma has less energy. At some point the gamma energy is small enough that the photoelectric cross section is dominant and the remaining gamma gives up its energy entirely to an ejected electron, which loses energy in the same manner as the electrons mentioned above.
The light produced in the scintillator passes through a glass window and into the photo-multiplier tube where it liberates an electron by the photoelectric effect in the photo-cathode of the tube. The photo-electrons are accelerated through a series of metal plates called dynodes. When an energetic electron strikes a dynode, several more electrons are ejected and are, in turn, accelerated to the next dynode. After typically 10 to 14 dynodes, the electron gain may be about 106. The electrons are collected at the anode of the photomultiplier tube. (See Fig. 4.)
{
${/download/attachments/164078984/fig_4.png?version=1&modificationDate=1499973046000&api=v2}$\\
Figure 4: Schematic of photomultiplier (PM) tube.
Question 4: What polarity (positive or negative) would you expect at the dynode output? At the anode output?
| In this experiment, you will look at the spectrum of gammas produced by Cesium-137 (Cs-137), Sodium-22 (Na-22) and Barium-133 (Ba-133). Here, you will find the nuclear decay schemes for these (and other) isotopes. |
When looking at a decay scheme, each column of horizontal lines represents the nuclear energy levels of a specific isotope of some element. Diagonal arrows indicate the process involved in changing from one element to another. Vertical arrows indicate changes in nuclear energy-level within one element. Gammas are emitted when a nucleus changes from a higher to a lower energy nuclear state within the same isotope.
In order to observe pulses from the photomultiplier tube, perform the following steps:
> Question 5: Sketch the pulses in your lab notebook. What is the pulse polarity? Does this polarity make sense, given how the PM works? What is the duration of the pulses? What is the range of pulse heights? What are the rise and fall times of the pulses? (See Fig. 5.)
{
${/download/attachments/164078984/fig_5.png?version=1&modificationDate=1499973046000&api=v2}$
Figure 5: Defining the rise and fall times for a positive and negative pulse.
Remove the terminator and re-connect the cable directly to the scope. Look at the pulses again and try to measure their duration and height with no terminator at the scope input.
The RG58-U coaxial cable you are using has a characteristic impedance of 50 Ω (independent of its length!). On the other hand, the input impedance of the scope is 1 MΩ. This change in impedance from low to high at the cable-scope interface will cause a reflection of the pulse without a change in polarity. The pulses observed on the scope are the sum of the incident and reflected pulses. Using the terminator places 50 Ω in parallel with the scope’s 1 MΩ input impedance.
Question 6: What is the equivalent resistance of this parallel combination? How will the reflection be affected by the use of the 50 Ω terminator?
We would like to perform a quantitative analysis of the pulse heights. To do so, a histogram of heights may be created by using a pulse height analyzer (PHA). On the PHA, the horizontal axis – channel number – is proportional to pulse height. The vertical axis gives number of pulses having each height. Such a histogram is usually called a spectrum. The UCS-30 spectrometer may be used as a PHA.
| - Refer to the nuclear decay schemes here to help identify the origin of each peak in this spectrum. |
We wish to re-scale the horizontal axis of the PHA from channel number to energy in MeV (million electron-volts). To do so, we will use two known gamma energies: the 1.27 MeV of Na-22 and the 356 keV of Ba-133. Be sure to leave the high voltage and gain fixed for the rest of the experiment in order to preserve your calibration.
For the Ba-133, Cs-137 and Na-22 sources, acquire spectra and sketch them into your notebook. Measure the energies of the gamma peaks you observe and compare them to the decay schemes for each source.
Question 7: For each of the gammas, plot the energy vs. PHA channel number. How are they related? Does this relation make sense in light of the physical processes involved in the detection? Please explain.
> Question 8: What is the energy relationship among the Compton edge, the backscatter peak and the full-energy peak?