Show us the math :0 :0 :0
Let us start first with the case where there is only a frictional force $\vec{f} = -\alpha \eta \vec{v}$. Using Newton's second law we then find that $m\frac{\text{d}\vec{v}}{\text{d}t} = -\vec{f}=-\alpha \eta \vec{v}$. Orienting the system in one direction and rearranging we find
|$\frac{\text{d}v}{v}=-\frac{\alpha \eta}{m} \text{ d}t$|.
Integrating,
|$\ln \frac{v}{v_0} = -\frac{\alpha \eta}{m} t $|
assuming initial time is $t_0 = 0$. From this it follows that
|$\vec{v}(t) = \vec{v_0} e^{-t/\tau}$|,
where $\tau \equiv \frac{m}{\alpha \eta}$ is the time constant of the system (the $1/e$ time, that is, the time at which the particle reaches a velocity given by $v_0/e =0.3678v_0$). We can see that the velocity decreases exponentially toward zero, meaning that friction eventually slows down the particle to a stop in the absence of external forces that keep the particle moving.
What about in the presence of an electric field? In this case, Newton's law states:
|$m\frac{\text{d}\vec{v}}{\text{d}t} = q\vec{E}-\alpha \eta \vec{v}$.|
We see that forces balance out (that is, $\frac{\text{d}\vec{v}}{\text{d}t} = 0$) when it reaches a terminal velocity $\vec{v} \equiv \vec{v}_t = \frac{q\vec{E}}{\alpha \eta}$. We can thus reexpress the law as
|$m\frac{\text{d}\vec{v}}{\text{d}t} = \alpha \eta \vec{v}_t-\alpha \eta \vec{v} = -\alpha \eta \vec{u} $.|
where $\vec{u} = \vec{v}-\vec{v}_t$. Note that $\vec{v}_t$ is constant, so $\frac{\text{d}\vec{v}}{\text{d}t}=\frac{\text{d}\vec{u}}{\text{d}t}$ and the equation becomes $\frac{\text{d}\vec{u}}{\text{d}t} = -\alpha \eta \vec{u}$, which has the solution $\vec{u}(t) = \vec{u}_0 e^{-t/\tau}$ as above. Now recall that $\vec{u} = \vec{v}-\vec{v}_t$, so we have
|$\vec{v}-\vec{v}_t = \vec{u}_0 e^{-t/\tau} = (\vec{v}_0-\vec{v}_t)e^{-t/\tau}$.|
Assuming the particle starts from rest, $\vec{v}_0 = 0$ and we get
|$\vec{v}(t) = \vec{v}_t(1-e^{-t/\tau})$|
From this we clearly see that in the long time limit, the particle's velocity is given by $\vec{v}_t$.
In Eq. 5, we find that
we have introduced the //electrophoretic mobility//, $\mu_e \equiv \frac{q}{\alpha \eta}$, so that for spheres suspended in a low Reynolds number environment this becomes $\mu_e = \frac{q}{6\pi r \eta}$.
====But cows aren't spherical====
For our experiment, we will not be working with spheres, but rather pigment molecules, which means that our model for spheres will likely not be accurate. However, if we assume a low Reynold's number environment, our model still predicts that the terminal velocity will be proportional to the applied electric field.
======Experimental Procedure: Part 1======
----
=====Lab notebook template=====
One member of the group should click on the link below to start your group lab notebook. (You may be asked to log into your UChicago Google account if you are not already logged in.) Make sure to share the document with everyone in the group (click the "Share" button in the top right corner of the screen) so each member has access to the notebook after you leave lab.
[[https://docs.google.com/document/d/19xsxGlRzODC3J5FfhUDgX-d5PJ0ptCijkATUw51Qee8/edit?usp=sharing/copy|Lab notebook template]]
You will be using this notebook for today's and next week's lab. Make sure to save it and clearly mark the dates.
=====Testing the model=====
In this experiment, we want you to test the behavior of the particles predicted by Equation 5. More specifically, you will be performing electrophoresis of food pigment molecules in food coloring, using wet chromatography paper as the medium that provides a frictional drag force. Most food coloring dyes consist of a mixture of a handful of pigment molecules, each of which has a specific charge and molecular mass. This means that when the pigments are subjected to an electrical potential difference, they will experience an electric force that is proportional to the charge they carry. As such, you'll be able to separate the pigments based on the magnitude of their charge given that they will move at different rates. Figure 2 below shows some important parameters of these pigments.
| {{:phylabs:lab_courses:phys-120_130-wiki-home:new-120s:pigment-table.png?600|}} | {{ :phylabs:lab_courses:phys-120_130-wiki-home:new-120s:pigments.jpg?400 |}} |
| **Figure 2a**: Food coloring pigments' names and relevant parameters. Taken from //American Journal of Physics// 83, 1003-1011 (2015) | **Figure 2b**: Pigments we'll use in this lab.|
| {{ :phylabs:lab_courses:phys-120_130-wiki-home:new-120s:materials.jpg?400 |}} | {{ :phylabs:lab_courses:phys-120_130-wiki-home:new-120s:meter.jpg?400 |}} |
| **Figure 3a**: Volt meter. We will be using it in the DC setting.| **Figure 3b**: Toothpicks, flathead, pipettes, petri dishes, and trays. |
To perform the experiment, we have provided you with the following equipment, seen in the figures above:
* different pigments and pigment mixtures (when you're ready, ask your TA for a few drops of the pigments on a petri dish)
* 3 cm wide strips of chromatography paper (these will be available from a roll in the front of the room - please only take what you need)
* toothpicks (more will be available in the front)
* electrophoresis tray table with ruler
* rectangular graphite electrodes
* petri dishes
* 2 g/L baking soda solution (available in front of the room; you'll only need 4 petri dishes filled half-way with this solution)
* pipette
* high voltage power supply
* banana cables with alligator clips
* flathead screwdriver
Graphite is rather brittle, so be sure not to drop it on the floor or to put much stress on it as you insert it in the slots in the tray table. If you break one, ask your TA for a replacement.
=====Preliminary observations=====
Let us first get acquainted with the experimental apparatus and samples we will be working with. To perform the experiment, we have provided you with an electrophoresis tray table, a picture of which you can see in Figure 4. It consists of a flat surface with a rectangular well at either end. In this well we can insert rectangular graphite electrodes that we can charge by connecting the metal pins that keep the electrodes in place to the positive and negative leads of a power supply.
| {{ :phylabs:lab_courses:phys-120_130-wiki-home:new-120s:powersupply.jpg?400 |}}|
| **Figure 4**: Power supply. You will have two of these already wired up. The negative lead should be connected to the ground pin (the three parallel lines), so that we measure voltages relative to ground (zero).|
**CAUTION: Shock Hazard** You will be using the power supply at voltages up to 200V. While the currents will be rather low for our experiment, make sure not to touch the bare leads of the electrodes.
You will also be working with liquids. Be careful about spills near the electronic equipment.
The electrophoresis procedure will be done on the strips of chromatography paper. Each strip will be placed on the tray so that it lays flat on the surface. Both ends of the strip will go over the well so that, by carefully inserting the graphite in the well, the strip remains pinched and stationary. To prepare this:
* Hold the strip of paper parallel to the surface and over the well, as in the picture below.
* Insert the graphite electrode, letting it pull the paper into the well.
* Pull the paper softly so that its surface is flush with the surface of the tray.
* Holding the paper fixed to the table by pressing on it, place the other electrode in its well; it should pull paper from the other end with it inside the well.
* When both electrodes are placed in the wells and the paper is held taut and flush with the surface of the tray, tighten the screws with the lips pressing on the electrodes. These keep the electrodes in place and in electrical contact with the paper, and also serve as a point of contact with the power supply electrodes.
* Using the pipette, wet the paper with the baking soda solution and place the ends of the strip in a baking soda solution in a petri dish.
| {{ :phylabs:lab_courses:phys-120_130-wiki-home:new-120s:baretray.jpg?200 |}} | {{ :phylabs:lab_courses:phys-120_130-wiki-home:new-120s:oneelectrode.jpg?200 |}} | {{ :phylabs:lab_courses:phys-120_130-wiki-home:new-120s:twoelectrodes.jpg?200 |}} |
| **Figure 5a**: Electrophoresis tray.| **Figure 5b**: Push down on the graphite electrode while holding the paper taut.| **Figure 5c**: Insert the second electrode so that the middle of the strip on the tray is flush with the surface.|
Be careful not to puddle the solution, as this can cause the pigment to flow places. If you put too much, dab it with a bit of paper towel until you don't see any puddles.
Why are we using graphite?
When we apply a constant electric potential difference between two metals in solution, the ions in the water are attracted to the charged metals, causing them to react with them. This can cause unwanted electrochemical reactions between the metals, which affect the ion concentration in solution and thus how the pigment molecules behave and interact with the electric field. Consequently, we must use an inert electrode that does not react with the ions in water. Graphite (the material of which pencil lead is made) is inert in solution and its surface conductivity is enough for the potential drops across it to be minimal. Thus it can be used as an electrode for this experiment. Another inert material that is often used in electrochemical reactions and commercial electrophoresis apparatus is elemental platinum, which does not suffer from the resistivity of graphite nor its brittleness.
You will be observing what happens to pigment particles as they are subjected to an electric field using this setup. To do so, start by putting a drop of coloring on a petri dish. Then wet the tip of a toothpick with the dye and touch the wet chromatography paper strip with the tip, so that you end up with a spot of reasonable size.
What happens if the spot is too large? What if it's too small? Make several of different sizes and determine which one you think will be effective for measuring its position over a long time.
After doing so, think about the following:
* What do you see about the spot of colorant that may pose a challenge in making measurements?
* How will you determine the position of the dye? How will this affect your measurement uncertainty?
* What is the dye doing? Is it stationary? Moving? If so, in what direction?
Now connect each lead of the power supply to either crimping bolt to generate a voltage potential difference across the strip and set the voltage to a high setting between 120 V to 150 V.
* What do you see when you turn on the voltage? Are the different dyes behaving the same?
* At what timescale is the dye moving? How will you be making time measurements?
* In what direction is the dye moving? What does that tell you given the electric field you are applying?
=====Dye Position vs Time=====
[[https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1B7JfQd2ivk5Eo48AiyAcdBfdTJQT_oCJ?usp=sharing|Google Colaboratory Notebook]]
From the theory section above, the dye particles will reach a terminal velocity due to the frictional forces they experience in the medium. We invite you to do the calculation yourselves for a particle of nanometer length scales, which would lead you to discover that the $1/e$ time for this is in the order of femtoseconds, so that for all practical purposes the particle speed is constant. Therefore, we can determine this speed as the slope of a graph of the average position of the particles versus the time elapsed.
For a few colors, measure the displacement as a function of time when a large potential gradient (above 150 V) is applied between the leads.
Although the graphite rods are conductive, they do possess a surface resistivity, which means that the voltage difference between the rods will be smaller than what the power supply outputs. To obtain an accurate voltage difference reading, measure the voltage between the two rods by touching the leads of the voltmeter to the graphite rods, and not the aluminum plates pressing on them.
* How are you determining the average position?
* How are you ensuring that the successive measured positions of the spots are distinct from the previous measurements?
* For how long will you need to collect? Do you see any unexpected behavior as time goes on? Why may that be?
* Does the uncertainty in position change as time evolves? Is the uncertainty in time significant?
====Is your measurement reproducible?====
Using the second tray provided, repeat the experiment for a particular color using a few drops of that color. Do they all move at the same rate? What does that tell you about the movement of the particles and the assumptions we have made?
Repeat this last experiment for a specific pigment with at least two voltages. That is, for three different voltages, measure the average displacement for a few drops of one pigment.
===== Submit your lab notebook =====
Make sure to submit your lab notebook by the end of the period. Download a copy of your notebook in PDF format and upload it to the appropriate spot on Canvas. **Only one member of the group needs to submit to Canvas, but make sure everyone's name is on the document!**
Don't worry if you haven't finished collecting data. Next week we'll test the validity of equation 5 and see what can affect the electrophoretic mobility $\mu_e$ for a pigment.
Make sure to clean up the materials you used and the station for the next group.
When you're finished, don't forget to **log out** of both Google and Canvas, and to close all browser windows before leaving!
====== Post-lab assignment ======
----
Answer the questions/prompts below in a **new** document (not your lab notebook) and submit that as a PDF to the appropriate assignment on Canvas when you are done. You should write the answers to these questions //by yourself// (not in a group), though you are welcome to talk to your group mates to ask questions or to discuss.
===== Conclusions =====
The **conclusion** is your //interpretation// and //discussion// of your data.
* What do your data tell you?
* How do your data match the model (or models) you were comparing against, or to your expectations in general? (Sometimes this means using the $t^{\prime}$ test, but other times it means making qualitative comparisons.)
* Were you able to estimate uncertainties well, or do you see room to make changes or improvements in the technique?
* Do your results lead to new questions?
* Can you think of other ways to extend or improve the experiment?
In about __one or two paragraphs__, draw conclusions from the data you collected today. Address both the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the experiment and feel free to use plots, tables or anything else from your notebook to support your words. Don't include throw-away statements like “Looks good” or “Agrees pretty well”; instead, try to be precise.
===== Questions =====
In addition to your conclusion, try to include in your report answers to the following questions. Feel free to discuss among your peers or with the TA for ideas, but make sure the answers are your own. Do not worry too much about a precisely correct answer. Instead, think about what you have learned about electric fields and the questions that would arise when thinking about ions moving in electric fields.
- For the spheres in water, what do you think is the role of ions in the water? Would the particles behave the same in salt water? What about in more acidic or alkaline water?
- What do you think will happen next week when we use more acidic water (higher concentration of $\text{H}^+$ ions) by using vinegar instead of baking soda? Think about how the positive hydrogen ions will be attracted to the negatively charged pigment particles. Looking up [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric-field_screening|charge screening]] may or may not be helpful.
- You saw that different dyes move at different rates depending both on their geometries and the charge they have. How would you design an experiment to separate a mixture of pigments? Can this be applied to other sorts of molecules such as proteins and nucleic acids?
**REMINDER**: Your post-lab assignment is due 24 hours after your lab concludes. Submit a single PDF on Canvas.